Dear Anonymous -- would you please read what was written before spewing your hatred of everyone who dares to disagree with you?
As is, you're destroying the favorite myth of Democrats - namely the myth of their unquestionable intellectual superiority - by demonstrating the utter lack of reading comprehension. Hint: "sorry losers" referred to people posting pictures of themselves "apologising" on behalf of others.
would you please read what was written before spewing your hatred of everyone who dares to disagree with you?
There, there, how would I know you disagreed with me unless I read what you wrote first? Also, you were perfectly clear to whom "sorry losers" referred the first time.
Your standards for what constitutes "hatred" are unclear to me, though. I said nothing especially abusive(well, so far), and I'm a hater. You, as far as I can discern, called some people "losers," other people "immature," and again implied that those same people have a false sense of intellectual superiority, but that's OK. I'm lost. Must be something with my, um, concept of the world, or something. Or yours, of course, seeing how we didn't hold a vote on that yet.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-10 06:18 am (UTC)Also, "not reality-based community" is nasty whereas "a bunch of sorry losers" is a perfectly good way to to conduct a constructive dialogue.
I think I better let the DNC know; surely we can figure this stuff out given enough time.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-10 12:36 pm (UTC)As is, you're destroying the favorite myth of Democrats - namely the myth of their unquestionable intellectual superiority - by demonstrating the utter lack of reading comprehension. Hint: "sorry losers" referred to people posting pictures of themselves "apologising" on behalf of others.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-10 06:53 pm (UTC)There, there, how would I know you disagreed with me unless I read what you wrote first? Also, you were perfectly clear to whom "sorry losers" referred the first time.
Your standards for what constitutes "hatred" are unclear to me, though. I said nothing especially abusive(well, so far), and I'm a hater. You, as far as I can discern, called some people "losers," other people "immature," and again implied that those same people have a false sense of intellectual superiority, but that's OK. I'm lost. Must be something with my, um, concept of the world, or something. Or yours, of course, seeing how we didn't hold a vote on that yet.